Wikipedia:Reliable source examples. This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. This page provides examples of what editors on Wikipedia have.
If you can find a reliable off-Wikipedia source that proves that the contents of this essay are, in fact, the recommendations of your fellow editors, then do by all means share it with us. The rest of us, in the meantime, have decided that the mere existence of the essay is pretty good proof that Wikipedia editors have recommended its advice to others.
Wikipedia is not a reliable source.Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. This means that any information it contains at any particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. Biographies of living persons, subjects that happen to be in the news, and politically or culturally contentious topics are especially vulnerable to these issues.Essays, as used by Wikipedia editors, typically contain advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors.The purpose of an essay is to aid or comment on the encyclopedia but not on any unrelated causes.Essays have no official status, and do not speak for the Wikipedia community as they may be created and edited without overall community oversight.The guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources gives general advice on what is and isn't a reliable source; this essay aims to analyse specific examples of sources that might initially appear to be reliable, yet may not be. If in doubt about a source, discuss this at the reliable sources noticeboard.
Is Wikipedia a Reliable Source 2 February 2017 Is Wikipedia A Reliable Source In this paper I will be discussing the debate between pro Wikipedia’s Dwight Reed, and Rachel R. Wright, and con Wikipedia’s Nicole Irwin, Michelle Douglas, and Ivy Leigh.
Wikipedia as a Reliable Source Essay .is a collaborative resource, which aims to be a compendium of all human knowledge. In a serious examination of Wikipedia as a credible and valid source of information we need to place our argument within a definable framework. As I will show information has many uses, for the purposes of this paper I will examine the use of Wikipedia for scholarly.
The creators of Wikipedia are the first to admit that not every entry is accurate and that it might not be the best source of material for research papers. Here are some points to consider: Look for a slant. Some articles are fair and balanced, but others look more like the Leaning Tower of Pisa.
There is room for Wikipedia in the information world, obviously, but to rely on it as a primary source (as mentioned above) or, worse, an only source for research would be foolish. While it is.
Essay Wikipedi A Credible Source. questioning the use of Wikipedia as a legitimate research source. A legitimate source can be defined as a source that is well written with factual information by an author who is credible in the field to which the source is discussing.
It depends. I am an administrator on Malayalam Wikipedia. I also do recent changes patrolling on English Wikipedia. A lot of my time on Wikipedia is spent removing vandalism and misinformation from the articles. But I am far from some lone altruis.
Should You Use Wikipedia as a Reliable Source? Scientists Think So. Research finds that the open-source resource can be used academically with some help from digital literacy standards. by. Meghan Bogardus Cortez. Twitter. Meghan is an associate editor with EdTech. She enjoys coffee, cats and science fiction TV. Listen Pause. It might seem like common sense to exclude Wikipedia from the.
For example, the Simple English Wikipedia has an article about the Flat Earth Society, which claims that the Earth is flat, but the Flat Earth Society's website is not used as a source in the article about the Earth, because it is not considered to be a reliable source. For more information, see en:WP:FRINGE on the English Wikipedia.
Is Wikipedia Really A Reliable Source? The task or writing a research paper or completing a project that requires research can often be daunting and time consuming especially for those who are not in a research field. Because of this, many people will look to find a shortcut through this process. Wikipedia can be considered one of these shortcuts. According to Wikipedia (n.d.), “Wikipedia is.
The Wikipedia articles should rely on and reference reliable sources. Being an essay,. The articles in the online media, which is generally accepted as a reliable source of software-related information. Adequateness of sources. The choice of sources should heavily rely on the material they are supposed to support. Primary sources. The primary sources should be used with care. Though the.
I would not trust Wikipedia as a source. I also would not accept is a reliable source when grading papers as a as teacher. I do believe that Wikipedia can be used to help in writing papers. Instead of quoting from what Wikipedia says, you can use the citations at the bottom of the page to help guide you to other sources. You should then acquire.